Journal of Macromarketing

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, G.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, V.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 25, No. 2, 140-152 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0276146705280613
© 2005 SAGE Publications

Consumer Vulnerability to Perceived Product Similarity Problems: Scale Development and Identification

Gianfranco Walsh

g.walsh{at}strath.ac.uk

Vincent-Wayne Mitchell

CASS Business School at City University London, 106 Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8TZ, United Kingdom, v.mitchell{at}city.ac.uk

Branding and product differentiation should lead to distinct product positioning in the minds of consumers, which helps them to choose between products. However, the increasing numbers of similar products make it more difficult for consumers to distinguish between brands, which can lead to a loss of utility through mistaken and misinformed purchases. Despite this risk, little research has addressed the perceived product similarity construct, and there is no accepted measure or any idea of which consumers are vulnerable to it. This research develops a parsimonious scale for measuring consumers’ orientation for inferring that all products within a category are similar and identifies those vulnerable to it. Support was found for a one-dimensional six-item measure, and its reliability and validity were assessed. Cluster analysis identified three similarity groups of which one appeared highly vulnerable to seeing products as similar. Implications for consumer policy and marketplace trust are discussed.

Key Words: cognitive vulnerability • vulnerable consumers • perceived product similarity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of MacromarketingHome page
S. Commuri and A. Ekici
An Enlargement of the Notion of Consumer Vulnerability
Journal of Macromarketing, June 1, 2008; 28(2): 183 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of MacromarketingHome page
D. J. Ringold
Vulnerability in the Marketplace: Concepts, Caveats, and Possible Solutions
Journal of Macromarketing, December 1, 2005; 25(2): 202 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]