Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Marketing Management

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Macromarketing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Shaughnessy, J.
Right arrow Articles by O’Shaughnessy, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Postmodernism and Marketing: Separating the Wheat from the Chaff

John O’Shaughnessy

Columbia University; Judge Institute of Management Studies, Cambridge Universityjoshua2983{at}comcast.net

Nicholas Jackson O’Shaughnessy

Keele Universityn_o_shaughnessy{at}hotmail.com

Postmodernism, as a philosophy and a set of doctrines, has made incursions into marketing. The incursion into marketing has given postmodernism visibility among marketing academics. This article argues that there is a need for a critical appraisal of postmodernism’s potential contribution to marketing. What has been written so far on postmodernism as applied to marketing tends to be peripheral to the key doctrines of postmodernism. In setting out the postmodernist claims, this article argues that while some of these claims may be defensible, most are not. Insofar as the influence of postmodernism has been benign or progressive, it is because it has dramatized and intensified criticism already under way of the claim that the methodology of the physical sciences represents the only way to certain knowledge. The downside of postmodernism is an untenable extension of this insight that would, if adopted by marketing, be highly dysfunctional.

Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 22, No. 1, 109-135 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/027467022001010


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of MacromarketingHome page
M. Tadajewski
Quaker Travels, Fellow Traveler?: Wroe Alderson's Visit to Russia during the Cold War
Journal of Macromarketing, September 1, 2009; 29(3): 303 - 324.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing TheoryHome page
M. Tadajewski
Remembering motivation research: toward an alternative genealogy of interpretive consumer research
Marketing Theory, December 1, 2006; 6(4): 429 - 466.
[Abstract] [PDF]