Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Marketing Management

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Macromarketing
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Omura, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Analyzing Economic Development in the Republic of Korea: An Evaluation of Alternative Paradigms of Marketing and Economic Development, Part II

Charles R. Taylor

College of Commerce and Finance at Villanova University in Pennsylvania

Glenn S. Omura

Eli Broad Graduate School of Management at Michigan State University in East Lansing

This is the second part of a two-part study of the three primary paradigms employed in the study of marketing and economic development. In Part I, the paradigms were evaluated and compared on a conceptual basis, using what Halbert (1964) calls pragmatics criteria. In this part, the same paradigms are used to analyze the Republic of Korea. Differences in emphasis and resulting interpretations are presented. It is found that the political economy (or institutional) approach allows for a fuller explanation of Korea's economic development than either the modernization or radical paradigms. Future researchers studying economic development are strongly encouraged to consider the use of the political economy approach.

Journal of Macromarketing, Vol. 15, No. 2, 66-91 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/027614679501500206
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of MacromarketingHome page
J. D. Mittelstaedt, W. E. Kilbourne, and R. A. Mittelstaedt
Macromarketing as Agorology: Macromarketing Theory and the Study of the Agora
Journal of Macromarketing, December 1, 2006; 26(2): 131 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of MacromarketingHome page
W. E. Kilbourne
Globalization and Development: An Expanded Macromarketing View
Journal of Macromarketing, December 1, 2004; 24(2): 122 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Marketing TheoryHome page
W. E. Kilbourne
Sustainable Communication and the Dominant Social Paradigm: Can They Be Integrated?
Marketing Theory, September 1, 2004; 4(3): 187 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]